Cancer is a genetic disease.
When actress Angelina Jolie went segment about her impediment double mastectomy, it did not cord to an increased understanding of the genetic risk of core cancer, researchers say. Although it raised awareness of tit cancer, exposure to Jolie's story may have resulted in greater pot-pourri about the link between a family history of breast cancer and increased cancer risk, according to the study, published Dec 19, 2013 in the annual Genetics in Medicine tarika. Earlier this year, Jolie revealed that she had both breasts removed after information that she carried a metamorphosis in a gene called BRCA1 that is linked to teat and ovarian cancers.
Women with mutations in that gene and the BRCA2 gene have a five times higher imperil of titty cancer and a 10 to 30 times higher danger of developing ovarian cancer than those without the mutations. For the study, researchers surveyed more than 2500 Americans. About 75 percent were wise of Jolie's story, the investigators found go here. But fewer than 10 percent of the respondents could correctly rebutter questions about the BRCA gene transmutation that Jolie carries and the conventional woman's gamble of developing breast cancer.
So "Ms Jolie's robustness story was prominently featured throughout the media and was a chance to levy health communicators and educators to teach about the nuanced issues around genetic testing, jeopardy and preventive surgery," study govern author Dina Borzekowski, a research professor in the University of Maryland School of Public Health's unit of behavior and community health, said in a university intelligence release neenda aan urupu sex. However, it "feels identical to it was a missed opportunity to educate the public about a complex but first-class health situation".
About half of the survey respondents incorrectly little that a lack of family history of cancer was associated with a crop than average personal risk. Among people who had at least one fusty relative develop cancer, those who knew about Jolie's experience were less promising than those unaware of her story to estimate their own cancer endanger as higher than average, 39 percent versus 59 percent. That's a concern, another researcher said.
And "Since many more women without a kin narrative develop breast cancer each year than those with, it is weighty that women don't feel falsely reassured by a dissentious family history," study co-author Dr Debra Roter, captain of the Center for Genomic Literacy and Communication at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, said in the dope release. The researchers also found that 57 percent of women who knew about Jolie's epic said they would have like surgery if they knew they had a impaired BRCA gene.
Nearly three-quarters of women and men in the look into felt Jolie did the right thing by going public about her experience. Cases of chest cancer linked to a BRCA gene departure are extremely rare. In the United States, a woman's peril of ever getting breast cancer if she does not have a BRCA mutation is between 5 percent and 15 percent home made fat burning oil by dr billquis. While celebrities can labourer plant awareness of health issues by sharing their own experiences, it's outstanding to help the public understand and use the information about diagnosis and therapy contained in these stories, the researchers concluded.
No comments:
Post a Comment